Provisions and Contingencies

Scenario 1Fact zero Inc. ( competency, or the fellowship), which operates in the oil industry, is a U.S. subsidiary company of a U.K. entity that prep atomic number 18s its monetary statements in amity with IFRS and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A draft constabulary in a country where zilch operates in, which entreats a kill of priming coat already dirty, pass on possibly be enacted shortly by and by the year- force out.Issues Should Energy signalize a readiness, (i) in reporting to a lower place IFRSs, and (ii) in abidance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles? compendium (i) below IFRSs, Energy should get it on a prepargondness for the exoneratedsing be in its 201. IAS 37-14 states a prep bedness sh all(a) be acknowledge if (a) an entity has a birth covenant, (b) it is presumable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits pull up stakes be take to settle the promise and (c) a reliable image behind be made . When it is non clear if at that place is a evince stipulation, IAS 37-15 likewise defines a relegate covenant as agreement that more than or likely than non is risen by a aside horizontalt after taking accounting of all available register.Moreover, IAS 37-22 in like manner specifically leads that where details of a proposed vernal fairness view however to be finalized, an debt instrument arises only when the economy is virtually accredited to be enacted as drafted. As it is virtually genuine that the jurisprudence entrust be enacted shortly after year-end, it is highly possible the political party forget be undeniable to clean up the contamination. The sum of stipulation is overly skillful, as the ships company has cleaned up contaminations in some different countries in which it operates. As a egress, Energy should do a proviso.(ii) Under U.S. GAAP, Energy should discover a expiration for the putting to death costs in its 201 monetary st atements. ASC 450-20-25-2 provides that an computed bolshie from a loss contingency shall be accumulated by a charge to income if (a) information available before the monetary statements are issued indicates it is apparent that a financial obligation had been incurred at the see of financial statements and (b) the get along of loss can be reasonably estimated. If the draft law is enacted, Energy pull up stakes be needful to clean up the bring that was contaminated by the play alongs operations. In addition, it is virtually certain that the law impart be enacted shortly after the year-end. Therefore, it is probable that Energy has incurred a financial obligation because the draft law impart likely be enacted. Also, the step of cleaning cost can easily be estimated as the Company has cleaned up its contamination in other countries in which it operates. As a matter, a provision should be recognise.Scenario 2FactFuelSource Co (FuelSource or the Company), which operat es in the oil industry, is a U.S. subsidiary of a U.K. entity that prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS and U.S. GAAP. The Company operates in muddied Country where it has no environmental legislation that requires violent death of contamination. However, FuelSource and its U.K. parent hurt a widely published environmental insurance to clean up all contamination and have a phonograph recording of complying the policy.Issues Should FuelSource recognize a provision, (i) in reporting chthonian IFRSs, and (ii) in accordance with U.S. GAAP?Analysis (i) Under IFRS, FuelSource should recognize a provision for its cleanup cost. IAS 37-17 defines obligating as a past answer that leads to a present obligation. IAS 37-17(b) further explains that in the case of a formative obligation, where the caseful (which may be an action of the entity) creates valid expectations in other parties that the entity impart discharge the obligation. As FuelSource and its U.K. pare nt tend to honortheir widely published environmental policy to clean up all contamination, it creates expectations in other parties that their operation in Dirty Country pull up stakes take their global policy as they al steerings did in the other countries.The environmental policy creates a constructive obligation as a result of their record of honoring the policy even though good obligation does non exist in this case. Since FuelSource has a constructive obligation as a result of a past event and an estimable cleanup cost will be required to settle the obligation, it meets all of the requirements to recognize a provision at a lower place IAS 37-14. Therefore, FuelSource should recognize a provision below IFRS.(ii) Under U.S. GAAP, FuelSource should non recognize a loss in its financial statement, and is not required to disclose the potential obligation of the cleanup cost. ASC 410-30-25-1 requires the accruement of a indebtedness arisen by environmental obligation if two (a) it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a financial obligation has been incurred and (b) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, are met.To determine the hazard of an environmental remediation liability, ASC 410-30-25-4 further explains that two elements need to be met (a) judicial proceeding has commenced or a claim or an judgment has been take a firm stand or, starting of litigation or assertion of a claim or an estimate is probable (b) it is probable that the outcome of such litigation, claim, or judicial decision will be unfavorable. However, in this case, the Company has no good obligation to clean up the contamination in Dirty Country as thither is no such environmental legislation that requires to do so. Moreover, cleanup of contamination in other country outside of United States is not required by any of the Federal laws or Codification.It is remote that in that location will be any litigation claim or assessment asserted that FuelSource wo uld be responsible for participating in a remediation. Therefore, it fails both of the criterions to a lower place ASC 410-30-25-4 and recognition of a provision is not required. ASC 450-20-50-6 states that disclosure is not required of a loss contingency involving an unasserted claim or assessment if on that evidence has been no manifestation by a potential claimant of an sense of a possible claim or assessment. As there is no law or regulation that requires a cleanup in Dirty Country, disclosure is not required by the Codification.Scenario 3Fact A moment of changes to the income impose system are introduced by the government and Energy, or the Company, will have to retrain its administrative and sales workforce to ensure accordance with hot system. No prepare has taken place as or the residuum sheet date.Issues Should Energy recognize a provision for the evaluate costs to retrain the faculty (i) under IFRSs and (ii) in accordance with U.S. GAAP?Analysis(i) Under IFRS, Energy should not recognize a provision for the expect costs to retrain the faculty. IAS 37-14(a) specifically requires a provision shall be recognized only when an entity has a present obligation as a result of a past event. As no obligation was oblige by the government to provide the training to its ply or the obligation is not owed to any third party, the liability should only be recognized as it occurs (when the retrain takes place). Furthermore, IAS 37-80(b) provides that A restructuring provision shall take on bet pulmonary tuberculosiss that are not associated with the ongoing activities of the entity and IAS 37-81(a) specifically states that a restructuring provision does not include such costs as retraining or relocating continuing staff. As a result, no provision should be recognized, as the retraining of the staff does not arise any present obligation since the retraining has not taken place yet and it does not discard as a restructuring expenditure.(ii) Under U. S. GAAP, Energy should not recognize a loss in its financial statement for the flowing year. ASC 450-20-25-2(a) provides that An estimated loss shall be accumulated if it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred. As the changes of income assess did not impose any obligation on the Company by the government or company policy to provide retraining of the staff to ensure compliance with the system, the Company has no liability at the sequence of the change or before the year-end as the retraining has nottaken place yet. ASC 450-20-25-4 further explains that the condition in ASC 450-20-25-2(a) is intended to forbid accrual losses that relate to the prox day flows. As the retraining of staff would enhance the efficiency of rising operation, it will go a liability to the Company as it occurs. Therefore, the retraining shall not be recognized as a loss for the current year.Scenario 4Fact FuelSource, or the Company, is required to stack away g rass filters in its factories by June 30, 20X2 under new legislation. FuelSource has not yet installed the heap filters as of December 31, 20X1.Issues Should FuelSource recognize a provision of December 31, 20X1 (i) under IFRSs and (ii) in accordance with U.S. GAAP?Analysis (i) Under IFRS, FuelSource should not recognize a provision but disclose a dependent on(p) upon(p) liability. IAS 37-19 specifically states that It is only those obligations arising from past events existing independently of an entitys future actions that are recognized as provisionsIn contrast, because of commercial message pressures or legal requirements, an entity may intend or need to be given out expenditure to operation in a particular way in the future (for grammatical case, by fitting smoke filters in a certain lineament of factory). Because the entity can avoid the future expenditure by its future actions, for example by changing its method of operation, it has no present obligation for that futur e expenditure and no provision is recognized.In this case, FuelSource should not recognize a provision as it has no present obligation at this point of time and installing smoke filters would allow the Company to avoid future expenditure. However, IAS 37-86 states that unless the possibility of any outflow in resolving power is remote, an entity shall disclose individually class of contingent liability at the end of the reporting arrest a brief description of the nature of the contingent liability. FuelSource will berequired to disclose the information regarding of the contingent liability in its financial statement(ii) Under U.S. GAAP, FuelSource should not recognize a loss in the financial statement for the current period. ASC 450-20-25-2 explains that the purpose of the conditions depict in (a) and (b) is to require accrual of losses when they are reasonably estimate and relate to the current or a front periodeven the losses that are reasonably estimable shall not be accrue if it is not probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of an entitys financial statements because those losses relate to a future period rather than the current or a prior period. Since the new legislation does not require the Company to install smoke filters until June 30, 20X2, which is after the balance sheet date, it has not yet incurred a liability to the Company as of December 31, 20X1. As a result, it fails the quantify requirement under ASC 450-20-25-2 and FuelSource is not required to recognize a provision. provision and ContingenciesScenario 1Fact Energy Inc. (Energy, or the Company), which operates in the oil industry, is a U.S. subsidiary of a U.K. entity that prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS and U.S. GAAP. A draft law in a country where Energy operates in, which requires a cleanup of land already contaminated, will possibly be enacted shortly after the year-end.Issues Should Energy recognize a provis ion, (i) in reporting under IFRSs, and (ii) in accordance with U.S. GAAP?Analysis (i) Under IFRSs, Energy should recognize a provision for the cleanup costs in its 201. IAS 37-14 states a provision shall be recognized if (a) an entity has a present obligation, (b) it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and (c) a reliable estimate can be made. When it is not clear if there is a present obligation, IAS 37-15 also defines a present obligation as obligation that more or likely than not is risen by a past event after taking accounting of all available evidence.Moreover, IAS 37-22 also specifically provides that where details of a proposed new law have yet to be finalized, an obligation arises only when the legislation is virtually certain to be enacted as drafted. As it is virtually certain that the law will be enacted shortly after year-end, it is highly possible the Company will be required to clean up the conta mination. The amount of obligation is also estimable, as the Company has cleaned up contaminations in other countries in which it operates. As a result, Energy should recognize a provision.(ii) Under U.S. GAAP, Energy should recognize a loss for the cleanup costs in its 201 financial statements. ASC 450-20-25-2 provides that anestimated loss from a loss contingency shall be accrued by a charge to income if (a) information available before the financial statements are issued indicates it is probable that a liability had been incurred at the date of financial statements and (b) the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.If the draft law is enacted, Energy will be required to clean up the land that was contaminated by the Companys operations. In addition, it is virtually certain that the law will be enacted shortly after the year-end. Therefore, it is probable that Energy has incurred a liability because the draft law will likely be enacted. Also, the amount of cleanup cost can eas ily be estimated as the Company has cleaned up its contamination in other countries in which it operates. As a result, a provision should be recognized.Scenario 2Fact FuelSource Co (FuelSource or the Company), which operates in the oil industry, is a U.S. subsidiary of a U.K. entity that prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS and U.S. GAAP. The Company operates in Dirty Country where it has no environmental legislation that requires cleanup of contamination. However, FuelSource and its U.K. parent have a widely published environmental policy to clean up all contamination and have a record of honoring the policy.Issues Should FuelSource recognize a provision, (i) in reporting under IFRSs, and (ii) in accordance with U.S. GAAP?Analysis (i) Under IFRS, FuelSource should recognize a provision for its cleanup cost. IAS 37-17 defines obligating as a past event that leads to a present obligation. IAS 37-17(b) further explains that in the case of a constructive obligation , where the event (which may be an action of the entity) creates valid expectations in other parties that the entity will discharge the obligation. As FuelSource and its U.K. parent tend to honor their widely published environmental policy to clean up all contamination, it creates expectations in other parties that their operation in Dirty Country will follow their global policy as they always did in the other countries.The environmental policy creates a constructive obligation as a result of their record of honoring the policy even though legal obligation does not exist in this case. Since FuelSource has a constructive obligation as a result of a past event and an estimable cleanup cost will be required to settle the obligation, it meets all of the requirements to recognize a provision under IAS 37-14. Therefore, FuelSource should recognize a provision under IFRS.(ii) Under U.S. GAAP, FuelSource should not recognize a loss in its financial statement, and is not required to disclose the potential obligation of the cleanup cost. ASC 410-30-25-1 requires the accrual of a liability arisen by environmental obligation if both (a) it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and (b) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, are met.To determine the probability of an environmental remediation liability, ASC 410-30-25-4 further explains that two elements need to be met (a) litigation has commenced or a claim or an assessment has been asserted or, commencement of litigation or assertion of a claim or an assessment is probable (b) it is probable that the outcome of such litigation, claim, or assessment will be unfavorable. However, in this case, the Company has no legal obligation to clean up the contamination in Dirty Country as there is no such environmental legislation that requires to do so. Moreover, cleanup of contamination in other country outside of United States is not required by any of the Federal laws or Codificat ion.It is remote that there will be any litigation claim or assessment asserted that FuelSource would be responsible for participating in a remediation. Therefore, it fails both of the criterions under ASC 410-30-25-4 and recognition of a provision is not required. ASC 450-20-50-6 states that disclosure is not required of a loss contingency involving an unasserted claim or assessment if there has been no manifestation by a potential claimant of an awareness of a possible claim or assessment. As there is no law or regulation that requires a cleanup in Dirty Country, disclosure is not required by the Codification.Scenario 3Fact A number of changes to the income tax system are introduced by the government and Energy, or the Company, will have to retrain its administrative and sales workforce to ensure compliance with new system. No retraining has taken place as or the balance sheet date.Issues Should Energy recognize a provision for the expected costs to retrain the staff (i) under IFR Ss and (ii) in accordance with U.S. GAAP?Analysis (i) Under IFRS, Energy should not recognize a provision for the expected costs to retrain the staff. IAS 37-14(a) specifically requires a provision shall be recognized only when an entity has a present obligation as a result of a past event. As no obligation was imposed by the government to provide the training to its staff or the obligation is not owed to any third party, the liability should only be recognized as it occurs (when the retraining takes place).Furthermore, IAS 37-80(b) provides that A restructuring provision shall include direct expenditures that are not associated with the ongoing activities of the entity and IAS 37-81(a) specifically states that a restructuring provision does not include such costs as retraining or relocating continuing staff. As a result, no provision should be recognized, as the retraining of the staff does not arise any present obligation since the retraining has not taken place yet and it does no t qualify as a restructuring expenditure. (ii) Under U.S. GAAP, Energy should not recognize a loss in its financial statement for the current year. ASC 450-20-25-2(a) provides that An estimated loss shall be accrued if it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred.As the changes of income tax did not impose any obligation on the Company by the government or company policy to provide retraining of the staff to ensure compliance with the system, the Company has no liability at the time of the change or before the year-end as the retraining has nottaken place yet. ASC 450-20-25-4 further explains that the condition in ASC 450-20-25-2(a) is intended to proscribe accrual losses that relate to the future periods. As the retraining of staff would enhance the efficiency of future operation, it will become a liability to the Company as it occurs. Therefore, the retraining shall not be recognized as a loss for the current year.Scenario 4Fact FuelSource, or th e Company, is required to install smoke filters in its factories by June 30, 20X2 under new legislation. FuelSource has not yet installed the smoke filters as of December 31, 20X1.Issues Should FuelSource recognize a provision of December 31, 20X1 (i) under IFRSs and (ii) in accordance with U.S. GAAP?Analysis (i) Under IFRS, FuelSource should not recognize a provision but disclose a contingent liability. IAS 37-19 specifically states that It is only those obligations arising from past events existing independently of an entitys future actions that are recognized as provisionsIn contrast, because of commercial pressures or legal requirements, an entity may intend or need to carry out expenditure to operation in a particular way in the future (for example, by fitting smoke filters in a certain type of factory). Because the entity can avoid the future expenditure by its future actions, for example by changing its method of operation, it has no present obligation for that future expendi ture and no provision is recognized.In this case, FuelSource should not recognize a provision as it has no present obligation at this point of time and installing smoke filters would allow the Company to avoid future expenditure. However, IAS 37-86 states that unless the possibility of any outflow in settlement is remote, an entity shall disclose each class of contingent liability at the end of the reporting period a brief description of the nature of the contingent liability. FuelSource will berequired to disclose the information regarding of the contingent liability in its financial statement(ii) Under U.S. GAAP, FuelSource should not recognize a loss in the financial statement for the current period. ASC 450-20-25-2 explains that the purpose of the conditions described in (a) and (b) is to require accrual of losses when they are reasonably estimate and relate to the current or a prior periodeven the losses that are reasonably estimable shall not be accrued if it is not probable t hat an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of an entitys financial statements because those losses relate to a future period rather than the current or a prior period.Since the new legislation does not require the Company to install smoke filters until June 30, 20X2, which is after the balance sheet date, it has not yet incurred a liability to the Company as of December 31, 20X1. As a result, it fails the timing requirement under ASC 450-20-25-2 and FuelSource is not required to recognize a provision.