Effects of Google Translate on Vocabulary

Effects of Google Translate on phrase encyclopedism and Reading Comprehension BY traveler0527 Effects of Google Translate on Vocabulary Acquisition and Reading Comprehension Abstract With the rapid developing of engine room, more than than modern ways are applied to position let oning. Though technology towards language realizeing has been extensively studied in recent yrs, the influences of online deracination are seldom examined. This get hold of investigates the do of Google repeat on slope lexicon acquisition and hold comprehension. It was hypothe sized that Google transmute rear improve students exploit in both aspects.The search was evaluated by an investigate which needed interrupticipants to cross-file one article and finish virtually r stimulate quizzes. To make a comparison, participants were divided into two root ledgers with only one can use Google depict. The results were unexpected. It seems that Google translate does not has a significan t positive effect to friend students learn English vocabulary and to improve recitation comprehension. Students who learn English, teachers who want to avail their students make promotion and queryers in this area could benefit from this study.Introduction The rapid development of technology in recent decades benefits the education area. Besides traditional inform methods, more approaches are employed in language learning to help learners make progress. Many studies have focused on impacts of contrary kinds of technology on English learning. Previous research from Kung and Chuo (2002) affirmed that college students acknowledge the net as a useful tool to learn English. Chun and Plass (1996) suggested that with mul successiondia program to assist high school students in interpret articles, the rate of attendant vocabulary learning increased.However, few studies have examined the effects of online commentary religious service on English learning. Research studies both voc abulary learning and nurture comprehension is alike difficult to find. in that respectfore, further investigations are needed. This research is aimed at investigating the influences of Google translate on vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Google translate is a kind of free online language translation service which can instantly translate text or web pages into numerous different languages. Vocabulary learning is an all important(p) and fundamental aspect of English study which stresses cognition and use of linguistic communication.Additionally, reading comprehension is an ability to understand articles which elated to recognition of content and grasp of main ideas. The lack of previous research on this topic leads to the research question Do students who use Google translate to help them learn English have higher efficiency than students who do not? It was hypothesized that Google translate will improve students understanding of unacquainted(predicate) interchan ges and the content of an article. Methodology Sample The sample participating in this look into consisted of 1 1 students from Yl- are non-native English speakers.Material Google translate, which is capable to offer translation of text immediately and can un perfectly on laptops, was used as aid for the try mathematical throng and defined as the independent variable. A relatively overbold article excerpted from Slate Magazine which is near patronage and trade was adopted as the test material. With an academic style and some 700 words, this article can be difficult to understand. A quiz link up to the article consisting of 8 questions about vocabulary learning and 2 questions about reading comprehension was similarly used.The first 8 questions ask participants to engage the right words to fill in 8 incomplete sentences. The furthest 2 questions are quaternary choice questions. Procedure Several meetings were held to shape the try and the quiz. After that, the unani mous experimentation was piloted in the researcher police squad to check the validity of questions and to ensure in that location would be sufficient time for participants to finish the reading task and the quiz. Another purpose is to make all(prenominal) researcher be familiar with the process. The formal experiment was conducted on nineteenth April in the EAP classroom.All members of the research team were required to bring laptops in dress to run Google translate. First, participants were divided into two convocations randomly. 6 tudents in the experiment conclave were allowed to use Google translate during the reading time. Other 5 students were treated as the crack chemical group. Then, a 3-minute- long brief guidance including rules of the experiment was attached to participants. Next, account copies of the article were confiden out and 1 5 transactions were arranged for participants to read.The experiment group was allowed to use Google translate when they encoun ter unfamiliar words or sentences, whereas the control group should read through the paper without any assistance. For both groups, taking notes and making marks in the reading paper were forbidden. Afterwards, quiz papers were distributed to evaluate participants learning outcomes and Google translate is out(p) to use. Participants were given 15 minutes to finish the quiz. Finally, all the papers were collected. The whole experiment was conducted in the EAP classroom and last for approximately 40 minutes.After the experiment, the research team gathered to mark quiz papers and the results were analyzed by using a data- recording table. Result and analysis The aim of this experiment is to define whether Google translate can help students learn English more efficiently. Without the independent variable, which is Google ranslate, all other conditions were kept the same to both groups. Therefore, it seems plum to say the experiment was conducted in a Just way. The most important find ing is one that out of the researchers expectation. The average grade of control group is nearly 1. 2 times higher than the experiment group (Figure 1).It reflects that the control group had a better performance during the test. Considering the result contraries to the speculation, deep analyses were given. The accomplishable reasons are as follows. Firstly, because of the lack of a pre-test to divide subjects, there may be a hance to put students who are good at English in the control group. Secondly, participants who have the privilege to use Google translate may rely on it whenever understanding of the content and the efficient use of context. Thirdly, since participants in experiment group needed to switch between the papers and laptops, it is stern for them to concentrate on the article.Fourthly, as Google translate can only give one simple definition of the word or phrase, this could be wide and sometimes could mislead those students. After data were entered in an Excel spreadsheet, the verity of ein truth question was alculated. As the Figure 2 below illustrates, the boilers suit accuracy of the control group is higher than the experiment group except for question 5 and 8. No one in the control group answered correctly to the fifth question and one third of them gave wrong answers to the eighth question.These two questions are aimed at testing students understanding of the meaning of new words. Google translate gives the right explanations which are consistent with the meaning in the content. This may indicate that Google translate can help students gain the meaning of some words which have clear and simplex meaning. However, the last question, which is a multiple choice question about reading comprehension, none in the experiment group gave the right answer while almost half of the students in the control group chose the correct one.The data suggests that students in the control group had a better understanding about the main ideas of the ar ticle. This may because there was no equipment to distract their attention and all they could do during the first part of the test was to read the whole content thoroughly. Another question that outlay being discussed according to the Figure is the sixth question, all participants in he experiment, no matter which group they belonged to, failed to answer it. The question is Even so, it is undecipherable how much the shift to inland growth really has. The correct word be chosen from the box is momentum.From the experiment groups perspective, it is proper to guesswork that the Chinese translation given by Google translate is inapposite and not related to the content tightly. This made it tough for those who take Google translate as a helper. From the control group viewpoints, it may perhaps be that the context is involved and the meaning is hard to guess. Another factor that needs to be come to is the question itself because it is a compound sentence and difficult to understand. To brief numbermarize, Google vocabulary and improve the comprehension of reading.Conclusion One of the most important findings is that the control group performed better with higher marks on average in the experiment about whether Google translate is helpful for students to learn new words and to understand better about the content when they read an article. Another interesting finding is that Google translate can be very useful when the target word has a definite meaning and at the same time, be very imited when relate to the text comprehension. In general, the findings are unexpected and contradict the hypothesis which claims that Google translate can have positive effects to English learners.It is also contradictory to the findings of Peters (2007), which claims that the use of online dictionary can enhance vocabulary acquisition. To sum up, though Google translate is useful when readers want to find students when they read an article or encounter words with multi-meanings. The unanticipated findings may relate to some limitations of this experiment. First, the topic is limited. Since the research topic is to examine the effects of technology on English learning, it can contain many subareas. For example, reading, listening, speaking and writing.The research group only focused on 2 English learning aspects vocabulary and text learning. Even the vocabulary contains lots of inspection points, such as spelling, pronunciation and word meaning. Also, use Google translate to represent technology is one-sided. There are other kinds of technology like software, recorder and e-dictionary. Second, for the experiment, the sample size is too small and lack of diversity. All 11 participants are year 1 students with the same major from the same education background. In addition, the sexual activity proportion is unbalanced.Meanwhile, a pre-test about the English level of the participants is lacked. Moreover, the function of Google translate is inadequate. In brief, th e limitations are in two aspects topic and the design of the experiment and these may lead to the unpredicted findings. The findings of this report lead to some recommendations. Firstly, students who learn English at the beginning level can use Google translate to find the meaning of the words, phrases and sentences to help them understand the ontent. However, it is not suggested to rely on Google translate to find definitions of every words.Secondly, teachers who want to help their students make progress in English learning could use Google translate as assistance more appropriately and efficiently in the aspect of simplex-meaning word acquisition. It is also advised that teachers should encourage students to think more by themselves actively and head off using Google translate to find the meaning of every new word. Thirdly, researchers in this area can gain useful information about the effects of online translation service n English vocabulary learning and reading comprehension.